Thursday 22 September 2011

Unions Call Collective Day Of Strike Action In November

Trade unions have called a collective day of strike action on 30 November, warning the government that Britain faces the "biggest mobilisation in a generation" unless ministers rethink "hugely damaging" changes to public sector pension schemes.

Up to 3 million public sector workers, including nurses, teachers and careworkers, are expected to take part in industrial action, with at least 14 unions committed to strikes over government pension reforms.

The TUC general secretary, Brendan Barber, said: "The intention will be to take the call for pensions justice for both public and private sector workers to every corner of the land on that day in the biggest trade union mobilisation in a generation."

Barber confirmed that the 24-hour walkout – potentially the biggest since the 1926 General Strike – could signal the beginning of a wave of industrial action as individual unions and groups of public sector workers mounted their own campaigns across the UK.

"Further consideration is being given to what further action may be appropriate beyond the day of action if progress towards a settlement is not secured," he said.

The GMB union, which has more than 300,000 public sector members, has warned that the action could spread into next summer, hitting the London Olympics and the Queen's jubilee.

The country's three largest trade unions – Unison, Unite and the GMB – announced their decisions to serve notice of ballots over pension reforms at the TUC conference on Wednesday, calling for strike action to be co-ordinated in an attempt to maximise pressure on the government.

Plans are being drawn up for sustained action in tactical and "smart" strikes, which would target specific services and could have an immediate impact without affecting vulnerable groups.

Brian Strutton, the GMB national secretary for public services, said after the debate: "We are talking about throwing everything at it that we can, rolling into next summer.

"We are not just looking to nudge this along. We are assuming that this will be a huge set piece conflict running for a long time."

Downing Street said the ballot announcements were "disappointing", adding that taking industrial action in the current financial climate would be "irresponsible".

David Cameron's official spokesman said: "Our view is that the best way forward is to continue with talks, and we have always been very clear that we should try to have a constructive dialogue with the unions.

"Clearly, it is disappointing that there have been calls for industrial action, particularly as the talks are still ongoing.

"On pensions, we have been very clear about the need for reform, but we have also been making the point that, even after these reforms come through, public sector pensions will still be among the very best available."

Cameron's trade union envoy sat in the TUC conference audience as unions described the pension reforms as an "unprecedented attack on ordinary people".

The collective public sector membership of Unison, Unite and the GMB is 1.65 million. Together with other unions in the process of balloting, co-ordinated action could involve up to 3 million public sector workers.

The move puts Labour-affiliated unions on a collision course with the party's leader, Ed Miliband, who told TUC delegates on Tuesday that strike action on public sector pensions was "a mistake".

The Prison Officers Association warned it was ready to defy the strike ban covering the service "if there is no deal to be found in negotiations".

The firefighters' union also declared that it was taking steps towards industrial action, while other unions used the conference platform to affirm their readiness to join sister unions in a mass walkout.

The NASUWT teaching union is among other unions preparing to ballot almost 250,000 members.

Patrick Roach, its deputy general secretary, said: "The attack on pensions is only one element of the assault on ordinary working people, on the public sector and on the welfare state.

"Be in no doubt – we are in the midst of a perfect storm. A perfect storm of assaults on pay, on jobs, on rights at work, as well as on pensions. That is why the NASUWT has committed to ballot its members for industrial action this autumn."

Dave Prentis, the general secretary of Unison, the country's largest public sector union, kicked off Wednesday's conference session by giving formal notice of industrial action ballots to 9,000 employers.

He said striking was the "last thing" members wanted to do, but the time had come to make a stand against government attempts to get its "pound of flesh" from workers by seeking to bring in new pension schemes with "far worse benefits".

"We've been patient, we've co-operated – but there comes a time when we say enough is enough because, if we don't, they'll be back for more," he said.

"It's a decision we don't take lightly and the stakes are high – higher than ever before."

Prentis rounded on the government for seeking to take the pensions of ordinary workers on low pay who had saved for their old age "every week of their working lives".

Gail Cartmail, the assistant general secretary of Unite, told the conference: "When the coalition came to power, we knew we faced the fight of our lives – we knew they would seek to weaken and divide us.

"While we will never walk away from talks, neither can we sit on our hands. We will support days of action and tactical selective action."

Paul Kenny, the GMB general secretary, said after the debate: "If Francis Maude [the minister for the cabinet office leading the pension talks] thinks everything is going to be all right, he had better get into practice in emptying rubbish bins and sweeping the streets. He is going to have plenty of work to do."

Barber told delegates: "This morning's debate has shown immense unity of purpose. We may yet need to show that unity in further action, and let no one doubt that our resolve and determination to win fairness and justice is absolute."

Len McCluskey, the Unite general secretary, said: "Hopefully the government will see the anger and perhaps take a step back, be a little bit more flexible and less intransigent."

News By:

guardian.co.uk

Headteachers To Vote On Srikes For The First Time

Teachers stepped closer to mounting their biggest strike in a generation this autumn after a headteachers' union decided it would ballot members to take industrial action over pension reforms.

The National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT), which represents more than 28,000 heads and their deputies, will hold its first strike ballot of its 114-year history from 29 September.

If members vote in favour of industrial action, a co-ordinated strike with several other classroom unions could take place on 30 November and would be likely to shut the majority of schools in England and Wales.

The National Union of Teachers and the Association of Teachers and Lecturers have already voted to carry out rolling strikes, while another teachers' union, the NASUWT, has proposed industrial action. The Public and Commercial Services Union has already said it is planning a strike in November.

A government-commissioned report in March by the former Labour minister Lord Hutton called for final salary pension schemes to be scrapped and replaced with career averages for public sector workers. He recommended that public sector staff should pay higher monthly contributions and called for a rise in the retirement age to 68 – most headteachers now retire aged 60 to 65.

The government has said changes are needed because the cost of teachers' pensions will rise from about £5bn in 2005 to almost £10bn by 2015 as more staff retire and life expectancy increases.

Russell Hobby, general secretary of the NAHT, said the decision to ballot members was taken with "great reluctance". "Faced with a refusal by the government to negotiate on the basis of a proper valuation of the scheme, we feel we have no option but to demonstrate our anger at this attack on the teaching profession," he said.

"We fear for the future of a system with a demoralised and devalued profession. We fear that we will not be able to attract people to become heads at a time when targets and workloads are rising."

He said many headteachers believed an attack on pensions was a threat to the future of education itself. "Teaching is a vocation and no one entered the profession to get rich. However, we do need to ensure that teaching is an attractive career choice for the most talented graduates. Future pupils deserve nothing less."

In June, teachers staged the biggest school strikes since the 1980s over the pension reforms. More than 2 million pupils missed classes and thousands of parents were forced to take a day off work with nearly 6,000 schools closed and 5,000 partially closed. In total, half of schools were affected.

A Cabinet Office spokesman said there was "genuine engagement" with trade unions over pensions. "We have a lot to talk about and there are proposals on the table for discussion."

News By:

guardian.co.uk

Tuesday 20 September 2011

Kochi Scrapped From IPL,Threatens Legal Action Against BCCI

MUMBAI: The BCCI on Monday terminated its contract with IPL franchise Kochi Tuskers, citing "irremediable breach". The board said the consortium, which bought the franchise in 2010, had violated terms and conditions to the effect that things were now "irreparable".

"Because of the irremediable breach committed by the Kochi franchise, the BCCI has decided to encash the bank guarantee (in their possession) and also terminate the franchise," N Srinivasan, the newly elected BCCI president, said. He added that "the breach is not capable of being remedied". Later, chairman of the IPL governing council Rajiv Shukla said a decision on floating a tender for a new franchise would be taken soon.

However, it may not be the end of the Kochi story as the team is crying foul and has said that it will take the battle to the BCCI. One of the co-owners asked: "The deadline to pay the board is Sept 30. There is still time, so how can they simply terminate the contract?" Another member of the franchise, who said the deadline was not Sept 30 but 27, added, "If they are citing player dues as reason, it is inadequate."

The franchise has been neckdeep in controversy since the day it was bought by a consortium of seven separate entities/investors. However, the latest problem stems from the fact that one of the biggest investors (Anchor Earth, which owns 31.42%) is looking to pull out of the franchise because of internal squabbles. Anchor Earth's 31.42% stake is owned by brothers Atul and Mehul Shah. However, the Shahs don't seem to have a common view on investment in cricket, which is why their role in the Tuskers' future remains uncertain. "Who has said the franchise can't raise the money? The deadline is still a week away, why is the board jumping the gun," said one of the co-owners .

If Kochi goes to court, it will be the third franchise after Rajasthan Royals and Kings XI Punjab to do so. Royals and Kings had been sacked early this year and the two sides moved courts to make their way back into the cash-rich T20 league. However, some in the IPL say political influences in the BCCI are causing these troubles.

According to them, the crux of the current problem is that some investors/politicians want the franchise to shift from Kochi to Ahmedabad. Meanwhile, the BCCI is convinced about its decision and it is learnt that it has sought thorough legal opinion on the issue.

The Kochi franchise was bought by the consortium in 2010 for $333.33m (approx Rs 1,500 crore). Just last month, NRI Ravi Pillai, who recently acquired the Kovalam property of hotel Leelaventures, and filmmaker and cricket buff Priyadarshan from Kerala, are learnt to have acquired 15% stake in the franchise. The existing shareholding pattern of the franchise is as follows (Ravi Pillai and Priyadarshan not included): Anchor Earth 31.42%, Parinee Developers 30.27%, Film Waves Combine 13.97%, Anand Shyam Estate 9.3%, Vivek Venugopal 5%, Rendezvous 10% (5% paid, 5% free).

HAVE SOME TEAM OWNERS GOT WHAT THEY WANTED?

Soon after the decision by the BCCI to 'terminate' Kochi Tuskers Kerala from the IPL was out, team owners expectedly expressed shock and termed the decision harsh. But top sources close to the franchises told TOI that some team promoters "got what they wanted"

EYEWASH?

"Team promoters might be claiming that they will go to the court against the BCCI decision. They might as well. But even if the team owners go to court, they will demand a change in venue from the court by citing the losses they suffered in their first year of IPL at Kochi. I think on hindsight they are happy with the BCCI decision," the source said.

FUTURE IMPERFECT FOR PLAYERS

BCCI president N Srinivasan said there is no question of any change in the BCCI's stand. So what will happen to the players? "We have not thought about what to do about the players who played for Kochi IPL. But all those matters will be discussed and decided by the IPL governing council," said Srinivasan.

SREESANTH OPTIMISTIC

Cricketer S Sreesanth, who played for Kochi in their inaugural season, said: "I don't know about the reasons behind the BCCI decision. But I hope and pray the issues will be resolved soon and we get to play in Kochi next season too."

NEW BACKERS

With earlier reports suggesting that the team owners were keen to move Kochi Tuskers to Ahmedabad, the Kerala Cricket Association (KCA) had approached businessman Ravi Pillai and film director Priyardarshan to buy a stake in the franchisee and retain the base of the team in Kochi. Priyadarshan told TOI that they had signed a MoU with the Kochi franchisee and presented it to the BCCI some time back. "We had agreed to take 20% stake in the team provided the team plays in Kochi and the team owners resolve their pending issues with BCCI. We are still ready to get involved if the owners resolve their issues with BCCI," he said.

'ALL IS NOT LOST'

KCA secretary TC Mathew thinks all is not lost for Kochi IPL. "Yes , the BCCI has terminated the Kochi franchisee. But if they pay up the bank guarantee of Rs 156 crore to BCCI and tender an apology, I still think there is a way out," said Mathews. Former Kerala cricketer P Ranganathan said: "The biggest problem with Kochi Tuskers Kerala team was that the owners were not from Kerala. They were never interested in the development of Kerala cricket."

Former Kerala cricket captain Ananthapadmanabhan said the decision was a big blow for cricket in Kerala: "Young cricketers from Kerala benefited immensely from IPL. They could train along with some of the big players in international cricket and learn a lot from them. This decision will be a big blow to their aspirations."

Timeline of the drama involving Kochi, Rajasthan and Kings XI Punjab...

MARCH 21, 2010:

Kochi wins bid for IPL team

APRIL 16:

Lalit Modi tweets on IPL Kochi, questioning the ownership and role of minister Shashi Tharoor

OCTOBER 10:
BCCI terminates Rajasthan Royals and Kings XI Punjab's IPL contracts

OCTOBER 27:

BCCI gives squabbling Kochi 30 days to 'solve problems'

NOVEMBER 13:

Kings XI drags BCCI to court over scrapping order

NOVEMBER 25:

Kochi offers to withdraw from IPL

NOVEMBER 27:

Kochi offers to resolve problems, hands over new ownership pattern

DECEMBER 1:


Rajasthan Royals get interim relief for 6 weeks

DECEMBER 5:

Kochi gets green signal to field IPL team

JANUARY 8-9 , 2011:

Kochi franchise spends close to $9m on players in their first-ever auction

MARCH 26:


Kochi franchise demands a 25% waiver from franchise fee because number of matches are reduced

APRIL 9:


Kochi debuts in IPL 4

APRIL: 30:

BCCI rejects Kochi demand for waiver

JUNE 23:


Kochi requests for franchise to be shifted to Ahmedabad

SEPTEMBER 19:


Contract with Kochi Tuskers terminated

News By:

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

Latest Action From The Liverpool Cricket Competition’s Premier Division

THE chase for the 2011 Bridging Finance Solutions LDCC Premier League will go down to the last week after three of the top four won to leave Ormskirk nine points clear at the top.

Ormskirk travelled to last season’s champions Lytham where they won a rain-affected game comfortably by eight wickets.

Australian Dominic O’Brien (53) top-scored as Lytham crumbled to 134 all out, with Martyn Farrell (5-27) continuing his fine recent form. Matty Glayzer then hit an unbeaten 58 to leave the Brook Lane side needing to beat Rainford in their last game to confirm the title.

Northern’s hunt for a second Premier title took a huge knock after they could only draw with Hightown. South African Shaun Vosloo (69) helped set up a healthy score, as he shared an opening stand of 112 with Guy Edwards. John Wildman (4-49) and Nick Doggett (3-30) made life difficult for Hightown, but the Ocean View side posted a competitive 213 for nine declared. The ever-consistent Chris Tipper hit 69 but Northern’s middle order struggled with the bowling of Ian Sutcliffe who claimed six for 60. Wickets fell regularly as Northern were left ruing a ninth draw of the 2011 season.

Leigh go into the final weekend as Ormskirk’s nearest challengers following a hard-fought win over relegated Northop Hall. Thomas Foster (46) top scored for Leigh as they reached 190 for seven declared.

Danny Nolan (3-33) bowled well for Hall, who went down fighting with Michael Littler hitting an unbeaten 53 as they were dismissed for 145. Michael Baer (5-53) and Hamish Kingston (3-29) bowled well to keep Leigh in contention.

Bootle are third and still in with a chance after they won a thriller against Rainford. Captain David Snellgrove maintained his status as the Premier League’s leading run-scorer with 52, with wicket-keeper Davy Smith hitting an identical score to help the visitors reach 205 all out. Andrew Pickavance was the pick of the Rainford bowlers with a brilliant spell of six for 49 but this was Snellgrove’s day as the skipper took five for 58. Lancashire spinner Stephen Parry chipped in with four for 76, as Rainford were dismissed an agonising four runs short despite Tom Meredith’s 62.

New Brighton’s hopes of winning the title disappeared following their defeat to Colwyn Bay. It has been a disappointing season for the Welshmen, but they showed what they were capable of by bowling out Tim Watkins’s side for just 139. Paul Jenkins (6-61) Ryan Holtby (4-61) took the 10 wickets and it was left to David Taylor (53) to ensure a seven-wicket win.

In the other top flight encounter, Newton-le-Willows’ long-expected relegation was confirmed after they fell to a 16th defeat of the season against Highfield.

News By:

liverpooldailypost.co.uk

Kiwi Pacer Tim Southee Suffers Knee Injury

New Zealand pacer, Tim Southee, has suffered a knee injury which has effectively ruled him out of the ongoing Champions League T20. The news confirmed by New Zealand's direct of cricket, John Buchanan.

The player was scheduled to join last year's winners, Chennai Super Kings, but will now remain in his country and continue his rehabilitation.

"Tim has suffered some cartilage damage to his left knee while preparing for the Champions League.," John Buchanan, the New Zealand director of cricket said. "He requires further assessment to determine the seriousness of the injury but initial signs indicate that he is unlikely to require surgery."

One of the brightest young talents to come out of New Zealand cricket in recent years, Southee rose to fame with his impressive debut performance in the Napier Test match against England, where the player grabbed a five-wicket haul.

He also showed his all-round ability, smashing the fastest half-century for his country in 29 balls, and ended the innings with an unbeaten 77 off 40, which included four fours and nine sixes.

Southee was the third highest wicket-taker in the ICC World Cup 2011, and scooped up the ICC T20 Performance of Year award for his devastating spell of 5 for 18 against Pakistan in Auckland, on Boxing Day. During the spell, he also grabbed a hatrick- a rarity in T20, dismissing four Men In Green batsmen in five balls.

However, his latest injury will be a worry, not only for the Indian Premier franchise, but also for the national team, which will be looking at the 22-year-old to spear-head their bowling attack after the team's disappointing year in the International arena.

The latest assignment for the Kiwi contingent will be an upcoming tour of Zimbabwe, where they will feature in two Twenty20s, three ODIs and one Test match. The tour, which starts on October 15, 2011, will be Ross Taylor’s first assignment as the new skipper of the team.

Regarding the extent of the pacer’s injury, Buchanan added, “Whether or not he will be available for New Zealand's tour of Zimbabwe next month will be made known later.”

News By:


blogs.bettor.com

Oxbridge Obsession Blamed For Holding Back Social Mobility Agenda

A “narrow, Oxbridge-obsessed” approach to higher education reform will thwart attempts to increase social mobility, according to a new report by a group of new universities.

Million+, which represents post-92 institutions, claims the coalition government’s plans focus too heavily on sending poorer students to elite universities.

Ministers need to recognise the benefits enjoyed by the larger number of students attending modern universities, it contends.

In its report entitled Universities driving social mobility – Beyond the Oxbridge obsession – which is launched today, the Million+ warns that the government’s “limited vision of social mobility will yield only limited results”.

“There is also a real risk that an emphasis on ‘fair access’ to a few universities will reinforce old hierarchies rather than promote the government’s wider objectives of ensuring that talent and achievement are recognised and rewarded, whatever a person’s family background,” it says.

Les Ebdon, vice-chancellor of the University of Bedfordshire and chairman of Million+, said: “To date, ministers have been too focused on the progression of relatively small numbers of younger students from free school meal backgrounds and state schools to a relatively small number of universities.

“These are very limited aspirations and will do little to ensure the progress of people from groups traditionally under-represented in higher education – those from poorer backgrounds, those who are the first-in-family to go to university, black and ethnic minority students and mature and part-time students”.

The report highlights the policy of allowing universities to compete for students gaining AAB or equivalent in their A levels once maximum tuition fees rise to £9,000 in 2012.

It notes that 16,100 of the 54,600 students in England aged 16-18 who achieved AAB or better in A levels in 2010 (29 per cent) were at private schools even though only around 6 per cent of all pupils are at private schools.

A further 5,420 (10 per cent) of those achieving AAB were at selective state schools

Million+ also cites a Department for Business, Innovation and Skills report published in June, which says students with lower A-level grades from state schools are likely to match or out-perform students from private schools with high A-level grades once they are at university.

Michael Gunn, vice-chancellor of Staffordshire University and executive member of Million+, warned about the implications of the recent higher education white paper.

“As the proposals stand, the investment available to universities to promote social mobility and ensure a high quality student experience looks set to be eroded,” he said.

“These proposals will privilege a sub-section of students by transferring more taxpayer funding via the student loan system to universities with the most socially exclusive student profiles.”

News By:

timeshighereducation.co.uk

Doubts Raised About PQA and AAB Proposals As Sector Responds To White Paper

Plans for students to apply to university after receiving their A-level results have been challenged as the consultation on the higher education White Paper draws to a close.

In its response to the consultation by the Higher Education Funding Council for England, which ends today, the Russell Group says it is unconvinced about the merits of introducing a system of post-qualification applications (PQA) by 2016.

It is understood that Mary Curnock Cook, chief executive of Universities and Colleges Admission Service, set out proposals for a move to PQA at a closed meeting at the Universities UK annual conference earlier this month.

But the possible admissions overhaul is questioned by the Russell Group, which says that “major changes…must be shown to offer significant benefits to the majority of applicants”.

“We would need to be persuaded that the potential benefits of PQA outweigh the disadvantages for students as well as the costs and major upheaval involved for both schools and universities,” it says.

“Any changes to the current system should not restrict the ability of institutions to make a fair and thorough assessment of applicants or that of applicants to make informed decisions about which university to apply to.

“We would particularly need to be persuaded that changes to the system will not hamper our efforts to attract students from disadvantaged backgrounds.”

Advocates of PQA say that many students do not apply to the most selective universities because they believe they will not secure the necessary grades. When they receive high grades, they realize they could have aimed higher.

However, critics say it leaves universities little time to select students, while applicants have a shorter period to choose where they will study.

It would also see exams brought forward six weeks, with students receiving their results in early July, rather than August.

The Russell Group, which represents 20 large research intensive universities, also outlines its opposition to proposed early repayment penalties on student loans, which are designed to stop richer students from paying less over time than poorer students.

“We recognise the merits of ensuring that all graduates make a fair overall contribution to the costs of their higher education and that that contribution should take income into account,” it says.

“However, we think that the government should not impose an additional penalty on those who want to repay early.”

With the Hefce teaching budget set to fall by £2.9 billion to £2 billion by 2014-15, it also calls for the government to concentrate state spending on high-cost subjects, such as science and engineering.

And it raises concerns over the student number control system, which will free institutions to compete for unlimited numbers of students with grades of AAB or better at A level, once these students are deducted from their core quotas.

Wendy Piatt, director general of the Russell Group, said: “We recognise that the high cost of the student support package requires some controls on student numbers and believe that maintaining quality is more important than increasing overall student numbers.”

She also voiced concerns over interference by the Office for Fair Access, which will monitor the number of students from poor families admitted to universities.

“We remain concerned that the government’s proposals on access risk focusing too much on regulation rather than resolving the real problems: underachievement at school and poor advice on the best choices of A-level subjects and degree courses,” Dr Piatt said.

However, the group welcomes plans for a “risk-based” quality assurance scheme, in which some institutions would be exempted from regular checks by the Quality Assurance Agency.

Meanwhile, the 1994 Group of smaller research intensive universities uses its response to the consultation to argue that plans to lift the recruitment cap on students with grades higher than AAB at A-level, and to allocate more places for institutions charging fees lower than £7,500, “may not create the responsive, demand led market”.

Paul Wellings, chairman of the group and vice-chancellor of Lancaster University, said: “We fully support the government’s desire for a system geared towards student expectations, where excellent institutions are able to expand to meet high demand.

“However, the proposals currently on the table don’t go far enough. They will only allow extra places for a few students, and mean that many others will be denied a place at an outstanding institution. The government needs to rapidly expand the proposals if it wants to see real competition and choice for students.”

Andy Westwood, chief executive of GuildHE, added that specialist institutions, such as art and drama schools, could be disproportionately penalised under the new system.

“Many of the government’s proposals run the risk of damaging key parts of the higher education landscape when local economies, public services and key sectors need it the most,” he said.

And Janet Beer, chair of the University Alliance, argued that the proposals could result in fewer places on “high-demand, high-quality courses with good employment outcomes in the mainstream of the sector”.

“We are concerned that this won’t lead to a demand led system. We therefore strongly support Hefce and the government’s commitment to monitor the situation and make any necessary changes in 2013-14,” she said.

“It is not the case the removal of numbers from one part of the sector and replacing them at another will cater for the same set of students or deliver the same outcomes.”

Pam Tatlow, chief executive of Million+, called for the government to withdraw the AAB and sub-£7,500 proposals or at least delay their implementation until 2013-14.

“It is too tight a timetable to implement”, she said. “The government needs to take these plans off the table and start again”.

She criticized the “removal of taxpayer funding from more socially inclusive universities” and the transfer of resources to more elite universities via the student loan system.

In its submission to Hefce, Million+ states the plans “may not…promote higher quality teaching, particularly as the White Paper lacks a direct and specific focus on supporting excellence in teaching and learning.”

It adds: “Unrestricted recruitment of ‘high achieving’ AAB+ students creates a perversity in the market which has the effect of privileging choice for a sub-section of students at the expense of others.”

News By:

timeshighereducation.co.uk

The New Vice Chancellor Of Cardiff University Has Been Announced As Professor Colin Riordan

The new Vice Chancellor of Cardiff University has been announced as Professor Colin Riordan.

Dr David Grant, Cardiff University’s current Vice Chancellor is due to retire from office in time for September 1 2012 when Professor Riordan takes over. Before he embarks upon his new role in Cardiff he currently remains the Vice Chancellor at the University of Essex.

The Chair of Cardiff University’s Council has stated: “When appointing a new Vice-Chancellor we set ourselves an ambitious task: to appoint a person with academic standing, a commitment to high-quality teaching and someone with a clear view of the contribution that Cardiff University makes to Wales, the UK and internationally.”

Professor Riordan has had a number of significant roles within the higher education sector. The Higher Education Funding Council for England saw him Chair the 2009 enquiry into teaching quality; he has been involved in the Edge Foundation and the Equality Challenge Unit. He is also a board member of Universities UK, Chairs the Board of University Campus Suffolk and Chairs the International and European Policy Network of Universities UK.

The Chair of Cardiff University’s Council added, “In Professor Riordan we have found that person. As well as his outstanding leadership and management skills, he has a proven understanding of research, the teaching needs of students and of the wider contribution of higher education to society as well as the international context in which universities operate.”

Professor Riordan commentated on his new position, “I feel very privileged to be given the opportunity to lead Cardiff University and build on the outstanding achievements of Dr David Grant and all his colleagues in the University.

“This is a very challenging time in the development of higher education. However, as Wales’s leading University, Cardiff is well placed to play a significant role in the future landscape upon which so much depends.

Dr Wendy Piatt, Director of the Russell Group expressed that they were “delighted” to hear of Professor Riordan’s appointment.

Welsh Assembly Government Education Minister, Leighton Andrews AM has also commented on the appointment, “”I would like to extend a welcome to Professor Riordan who will return to Wales after a successful career leading Essex University and playing a significant part in national developments in England. I have no doubt that Professor Riordan will make a significant contribution to the growth and development of the sector in this important time of change.

Professor Riordan has stated, “The University’s achievements and ambition ensure that it will remain one of the top research-intensive universities, offering high quality academic and professional education to a diverse range of home and international students.

“I very much look forward to joining Cardiff University in 2012.”

News By:

gairrhydd.com

Schools Take ICT Into Their Own Hands

New British Educational Suppliers Association (BESA) research suggests that by 2012/3 nearly half of all schools anticipate using ICT for more than 50% of their teaching time.

The 2011 survey of 1,324 UK schools (772 primary and 552 secondary), which was conducted in July 2011, also found that 10% of schools note that nearly all pupil-time will involve exposure to ICT, and that 49% of primary and 33% of secondary schools said that they were to maintain or increase their planned ICT investments for 2011/12.

The findings come from the 14th annual survey of the opinions and trends of ‘ICT in UK State Schools’.

Ray Barker, director of BESA stated: “The BESA ICT in UK State Schools research indicates that despite negative views about the funding of ICT, an increasing amount of pupil-time is exposed to teaching and learning using ICT. The government has moved very quickly to change the entire education system over the past year and many educators are confused. We have to be clear that schools are not going to be ‘told what to do any more’ so don’t need to wait to be guided by the government on their ICT investments.”

The research, carried out in conjunction with the National Education Research Panel (NERP), provides analysis into the likely provision of technology in UK state schools in the next year and indicates the value of teacher confidence and training concerning ICT in schools.

The research suggests that schools are set to increase the prominence of ICT and technology as teaching tools within the education system and at their own discretion given the lack of guidance from the Department for Education.

 At a time when schools are being given more autonomy in deciding how to spend their own budgets, the research suggests that we will see a movement toward increased staff ICT training and the integration of technology into everyday school life.

Barker continued to say: “Schools know that they must therefore continue to invest in ICT to stop a new form of digital divide being created – between schools. They are definitely not standing still – they are just getting on with it.”

News By:

edexec.co.uk

Monday 19 September 2011

U.S. Lead Slipping In Global Race For Higher-Education Degrees

The U.S. is losing its international edge in higher education as adults entering the workforce are earning a smaller share of the world’s college diplomas than those approaching retirement, a report found.

People aged 25 to 34 in the U.S. hold 20.5 percent of college and graduate degrees around the globe in that age group, according to a study of 42 countries released today by the Paris-based Organization for Economic Co-operation & Development. The U.S. share of those degrees in people 55 to 64 years old is about 36 percent.

To improve U.S. international competitiveness, President Barack Obama has pledged to improve college attainment among those entering the workforce. Complicating the task, the U.S. ranks 31st in math, 23rd in science and 17th in reading among countries and regions tested in an international assessment the organization released last year.

“The U.S. is fast losing its advantage,” the international report said today, citing the “rapid expansion” of college education in the industrialized world and emerging economies.

The U.S. has about 26 percent of the 255 million individuals with college and graduate degrees, a greater share than any other country in the study. China came in second, with 12 percent; and Japan, third, with 11.5 percent. At the same time, among 34 countries belonging to OECD, the U.S. ranks only 15th in higher-education attainment for 25-34 year olds.

China’s Youth

Contrasting with the U.S. generational decline, China’s youth surpassed their elders. Among China’s 55- to 64-year-olds, 7 percent have college and graduate degrees, compared with 18 percent for its 25- to 34-year-olds.

The U.S. has long been “the benchmark for success” in higher-education attainment and is now “quite alone” in reporting lower levels for those entering the workforce than those leaving it, Andreas Schleicher, who oversees OECD education statistics, said in a phone briefing with reporters.

Among OECD countries, the U.S. has some of the biggest economic payoffs for earning a college degree, including higher salaries and lower unemployment, the study found. U.S. college degrees are “by far” the most expensive for students, with direct costs such as tuition totaling $70,000, compared with the OECD average of $11,000, the report said.

News By:

bloomberg.com

England v India 5th ODI: Debutant Bairstow Blazes England to Victory

A sublime innings of 107 from Virat Kohli coupled with a gutsy knock of 69 from Rahul Dravid in his farewell match wasn't enough to help India achieve a consolation victory on the England tour as debutant Jonathan Bairstow's blitzkrieg of 41 from 21 balls coupled with contributions from Alastair Cook (50), Jonathan Trott (63) and Ravi Bopara (37) helped the home side chase down 241 from 34 overs, winning by the Duckworth/Lewis system with six wickets and ten balls remaining in a rain shortened fifth ODI at Sophia Gardens, Cardiff.

England won the toss and elected to bowl, the home side made three changes to their side, Jonny Bairstow was handed his first cap, and Samit Patel and Jade Dernbach replaced James Anderson and the injured Stuart Broad.

The Indians got off to a gritty start as the openers Ajinkya Rahane and Parthiv Patel negated the effect of swing, adding 22 from the first seven overs. Rahane had a life line in the eighth over when Samit Patel, at third man, dropped a sitter.

Rahane scored India's first boundary in the ninth over and doubled the tally off the last ball of the same over. The pair added 52 for the first wicket before Rahane (26) edged a Dernbach slower delivery to third man in the 13th over.

Two overs later, Patel mistimed an attempted chip shot into the hands of mid on, handing Swann a wicket in his first over. Rahul Dravid and Virat Kohli started the resurrection process as Kohli brought up his half century from 54 deliveries, and Dravid, playing in his last ODI, followed suit, bringing up his half- century from 62 balls.

Kohli took on Samit Patel in the 40th over, hitting him for two consecutive boundaries and a humongous six over long off, scoring 16 runs from the over. He brought up his century from 87 deliveries with a single down to square leg.

The pair added 170 from 26 overs before Rahul Dravid's brilliant limited-overs career was brought to an end by Swann who clipped his off-stump with a sharp off spinning delivery. Dravid scored 69 from 79 deliveries with four hits to the fence.

Kohli departed an over later, hit-wicket, off Swann as he rocked on his back foot and dislodged the middle and leg bail. India took the batting powerplay in the 45th over and Raina and Dhoni took the bowlers to the cleaners, scoring 51 runs, before Raina miscued one to extra cover off the penultimate delivery of the power play.

Jadeja departed off the first ball of the last over for a duck, caught at deep midwicket. Dhoni then took on Dernbach, hitting him for a boundary and a six before bringing up his half-century from just 26 deliveries off the last ball of the innings, setting up a challenging target of 304 from 50 overs.

In reply, England got off to a good start as the openers, Alastair Cook and Craig Kieswetter, added quick-fire 27 runs from first four overs. Vinay Kumar struck for India in the fifth over when he trapped Kieswetter leg before wicket for 21.

Cook and Trott then took the score to 52 for 1 in the ninth over before rain interrupted play, Play resumed after half an hour and England were set a revised target of 241 runs in 34 overs. After the break, the pair added 54 more runs as Cook brought up his half-century from 52 deliveries with a reverse sweep past third man.

He survived a dropped chance off the next ball before finally missing a Kohli slower delivery. Kohli disguised Cook with a slower delivery and cleaned him up as the latter went for a big one over long on and completely missed the delivery.

Ian Bell went on a rampage in the 21st over, mauling Jadeja for three sixes in an over and collecting 21 runs from the over. Trott brought up his half-century from 48 deliveries. Bell and Trott added 54 from six overs before Bell hit one straight to long off off RP Singh in the 25th over.

With 75 runs needed from 51 balls, Jadeja removed the danger-man, Trott, caught at gully for 63. However debutant Jonny Bairstow had other ideas as he played a sparkling innings of 41 from just 21 deliveries, adding 75 unbeaten runs from just 6.3 overs, helping the home side win comfortably With six wickets in hand and ten deliveries remaining. Ravi Bopara remained unbeaten on 37 from 22 deliveries.

Jonny Bairstow was named the man of the match for his intrepid innings of 41 from 21 deliveries.

Scores: India: 304/6; England: 241/4 (D/L method)

Man of the Match: Jonny Bairstow

Series: England won the 5-match series 3-0


News By:

isport.in

Why IT Should Fear Schmidt’s Education Warning

No doubt many patriots are seething at Google chairman Eric Schmidt’s comments on UK education. In Edinburgh, the former CEO claimed the education system was not inspiring enough kids to learn science, maths or engineering skills, hindering the chances of producing a future digital genius.

Schmidt said the UK had a long history of innovation, yet now there were no British leading lights in the digital arena, according to a BBC report.

“The UK is home of so many media-related inventions. You invented photography. You invented TV. You invented computers in both concept and practice,” Schmidt said during the MacTaggart Lecture at the Edinburgh International Television Festival.

"It's not widely known, but the world's first office computer was built in 1951 by Lyons' chain of tea shops. Yet today, none of the world's leading exponents in these fields are from the UK."

Can we possibly disagree with Schmidt’s assessment? The figures would suggest not.

The number of A-level students fell for the eighth year in a row in 2011. This year, 4,002 students took the computing A Level - only 0.5 per cent of the overall student population. GSCE students taking IT declined from 61,000 to 47,000 between 2010 and 2011 - a rapid decline indeed.

There’s no doubt this country’s educational infrastructure has already failed produce the next big thing in the digital world. Where’s our Mark Zuckerburg? Where’s our Bill Gates?

Yet a more perturbing aspect of this tech apathy in schools is the skills gap it will leave in its wake. When there aren’t enough younglings to fill spaces in IT departments, we’ll know we’re in trouble. Already there are gaps, in particular in the security space, as highlighted by the birth of the Cyber Security Challenge.

What does all this mean for IT departments though?

If the Government can’t stimulate a digital renaissance in the UK’s youth, we won’t only be left with a dearth in tech power houses like Autonomy, companies across the land will suffer from a lack of IT prowess.

As everyone in the industry has been reiterating over the past decade, IT needs to be included in top-level decisions. Technology is driving innovation across the world, so businesses need competent IT departments who can inform business strategy as a whole.

But if the quality of personnel is non-existent, if the education system isn’t spawning IT leaders with both technical expertise and honed business skills, then organisations won’t want to include CIOs in big strategy changes.

Instead, they will look to outsource to other nations, they will look to exploit the cloud with vendors from Schmidt’s home country. If we can’t supply IT departments, we certainly won’t be able to fill vendors with quality workers either.

So Schmidt was right. And IT departments should be worried about their future.

News By:

itpro.co.uk

Google’s Schmidt Slams Lack Of UK Tech Education

Britain is squandering its history of technological innovation, according to Google chairman Eric Schmidt

Google chairman Eric Schmidt has criticised the education system in Britain for failing to ignite young people’s passion for science, engineering and maths.

Delivering the MacTaggart Lecture at the Edinburgh International Television Festival, Schmidt also said that not making IT compulsory as a subject at GSCE-level and not providing enough support for science students at college meant the country was “throwing away” its computing heritage.

“I was flabbergasted to learn that today computer science isn’t even taught as standard in UK schools,” he said. “Your IT curriculum focuses on teaching how to use software, but gives no insight into how it’s made.

“It’s not widely known, but the world’s first office computer was built in 1951 by Lyons’ chain of tea shops. Yet today, none of the world’s leading exponents in these fields are from the UK.”
Bringing art and science back together

He said that Britain needed to reunite art and science, as it had in the “glory days of the Victorian era,” when Lewis Carroll wrote Alice in Wonderland while teaching mathematics at Oxford. He also mentioned James Clerk Maxwell, who was described by Einstein as among the best physicists since Newton, but was also a published poet.

“Over the past century, the UK has stopped nurturing its polymaths,” said Schmidt. “There’s been a drift to the humanities – engineering and science aren’t championed. Even worse, both sides seem to denigrate the other. You’re either a ‘luvvy’ or a ‘boffin’. You need to bring art and science back together.”

The former Google CEO also said that, while the UK does a good job of backing small firms, British startups tended to sell out to overseas companies once they had reached a certain size, and that this trend should be reversed.

“There’s little point getting a thousand seeds to sprout if they are then left to wither or transplanted overseas,” he said. “UK businesses need championing to help them grow into global powerhouses, without having to sell out to foreign-owned companies. If you don’t address this, then the UK will continue to be where inventions are born, but not bred for long-term success.”
Brits lag in IT

Schmidt’s words back up recent research from analyst firm IDATE, which found that the British technology sector is failing to keep up with the global pace of growth, expanding by just 0.84 percent in 2010, compared with annual global growth of 3.3 percent.

Steve Beswick, UK director of education for Microsoft, also warned earlier this month of a decline in the number of students taking IT-related A-levels, based on 2011 figures.

“IT jobs are growing at four times the rate of the standard jobs market. With fewer people with appropriate IT skills coming out of education, there’ll be no-one to fill the jobs available in the marketplace,” Beswick told Computer Weekly. “We could see more off-shoring to India and China as a result.”

Schmidt’s speech should add fuel to prime minister David Cameron’s plans to build a ‘Tech City’ in London’s East End, as a rival to California’s Silicon Valley. Intel, Google and Facebook have all committed to opening research labs or innovation centres in the area affectionately known as Silicon Roundabout, and Cisco has promised a long-term investment of technology, manpower and money for the government’s British Innovation Gateway project.


News By:

eweekeurope.co.uk

The Consequences Of Increasing Access To Education

Globally, there has been some good news on the education front over the past decade. Across the world, literacy rates have gone up, school enrolment rates have risen and dropout rates have fallen. Much of the improvement has taken place in the regions that most needed it, relatively low-income countries that previously had very poor enrolment ratios. And the improvements in educational outcomes have been particularly marked for girls and young women; gender gaps have fallen, and in some regions have even reversed.

We can point out that such improvements are still nowhere near adequate, but that does not take away from the clear positives. Yet there are implications for the future that remain inadequately analysed. Particularly striking in the medium term is not just the increase in education in general, but the significant increase in higher education.

Consider the facts. According to Unesco, in the decade until 2009 the total number of those enrolled in higher education across the world increased by more than 70 million, of whom nearly 60% came from Asia. Since Asia and sub-Saharan Africa continue to have much lower average higher education enrolment rates (averaging 10-20% compared to more than 60% in more advanced countries), this proportion is likely to increase even further in the near future. So the bulk of new entrants into higher education will come from these regions in the decade ahead.

Significantly, the number of women in higher education has increased at a much faster rate. Globally, women now outnumber men in higher education. In some regions (such as North America, west and eastern Europe and Latin America) the ratio is significantly above half. This is a process of great significance, because it is likely to bring in its wake all sorts of social and economic changes, and hopefully a much greater degree of gender equality in other spheres of life as well.

This is good news, but it also brings challenges that are still not fully recognised. The most obvious is ensuring enough productive employment to meet the expectations of new graduates.

There are several interrelated issues, the first of which is sheer quantity. Even during the phase of global boom, the most dynamic economies in the world were not creating enough paid employment to meet the needs of those willing to supply labour. In some countries this led to rising rates of open unemployment, especially among young people. In other countries, particularly those with poorly developed social protection and unemployment benefits, disguised unemployment was more the norm. But this was during the boom; the global recession, and the lingering uncertainty in world markets, have since made things a lot worse. In most economies, there are simply not enough jobs being created, even for those who have received higher levels of education.

The second issue is quality; that is, matching education and skills with the available jobs. The problem of skills mismatch arises even in growing economies. There are severe labour shortages for some kinds of workers and a massive oversupply of others. Often this is in spite of market forces rather than because of them, since markets and higher educational institutions tend to lag behind employers' skill demands before oversupplying them.

There is another aspect to this, which also has troubling social implications. The shortage of higher-level jobs has forced many young people to take roles for which they are overqualified. This in turn can create resentment and other forms of alienation. Some attempts to explain the recent UK riots have mentioned this aspect of youth frustration.

The third issue – and one that we all ignore at our peril – is related to the second, but reflects a slightly different process. The recent global increase in higher education enrolment is certainly welcome, but it should be noted that a significant proportion has been in private institutions with much higher user fees. This is especially true in developing countries, where costly private institutions often dominate higher education. In India, for example, around two-thirds of enrolment is now estimated to be in private colleges and universities and similar institutes. Even in countries where public education still dominates, there are moves to increase fees.

This creates another complication around the issue of employability. Many students, including those coming from relatively poor families, have invested a great deal of their own and their families' resources to acquire an education that comes with the promise of a better life. In the developing world, this hunger for education is strongly associated with the hope of upward mobility, leading families to sell assets like land and go into debt in the hope of recouping these investments when the student graduates and gets a well-paying job.

As we have seen, however, such jobs are increasingly scarce. It cannot be a recipe for social stability. Am I alone in thinking we are sitting on a timebomb?

News By:

guardian.co.uk

Does Scotland's University Fees System Breach Human Rights Laws?

Due to a loophole in EU law, while Scottish and non-UK EU students can benefit from a university education funded by the Scottish government, that same government is free to charge students from elsewhere within the UK whatever it deems fit for the same privilege. 

According to Phil Shiner of Public Interest Lawyers, this "contravenes article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights and could also be in breach of the Equality Act".  However, the Scottish government contends that as tuition fee arrangements are based on ordinary domicile and not nationality, the current system is lawful. 

Shiner's invoking of the Equality Act 2010 (can be seen as something of a red herring. While the act prohibits discrimination by further education bodies in the admission of students, it accepts discrimination relating to nationality, ordinary residence, or the length of time a person has been present or resident in or outside the UK, provided that the body is acting in accordance with parliament or arrangements made with the approval of a minister of the crown. It surely follows that the approval of the Scottish parliament to the current arrangement for tuition fees is proof in itself that the arrangements do not breach the Equality Act.

This does not of course preclude anyone from bringing a claim under article 14 of the European convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms (ECHR), which bans discrimination in relation to the application of the other convention rights. Under article 2 of the first protocol, one such right is unfettered access to education institutions. It is presumed that this will be the basis under which Shiner proposes to bring any action. However, the claim may not be clear cut as there is no direct discrimination; the basis of access to free university education in Scotland is one of residency, not nationality.

This applies both ways: if an English, Welsh or Northern Irish student is resident in Scotland they may be entitled in the same way as a Scottish student to free university education. Conversely, if a Scottish student is resident in another part of the UK they may well not be entitled to free university education in Scotland. If the claim were to succeed it would be on the basis of indirect discrimination in that the criterion of ordinary residency will inevitably affect English, Welsh and Northern Irish students to a greater degree. It seems that residents in those areas are more likely to identify with those respective nationalities.

It is important to note that any claim brought by an individual in the European court of human rights must be brought against a signatory to the ECHR. Therefore, the claim would have to be brought against the UK, not the Scottish executive. The Scotland Act 1998, which established the Scottish executive, specifically precludes the devolved government from doing anything which would be in breach of the ECHR or the Human Rights Act 1998. Therefore, if the claim against the UK were to succeed, the UK Parliament would be forced to rectify the breach. This has the potential to be politically explosive as Westminster would be forced to interfere in the domestic arrangements specifically devolved to Scotland. It is inconceivable at the moment that Westminster would abolish tuition fees in England. They could, however, be forced therefore to overrule the devolved institutions and harmonise the fees across the UK.

However, as tempting as it is to believe that such a claim might succeed, we consider it unlikely. The disparity in treatment between those resident in Scotland and those resident elsewhere within the UK is a matter of internal governmental policy as decided by those authorised to make such policy. The UK would surely seek to justify the current system on that basis.

And if that fails, the government will probably do its very best to get around the decision. Surely, this would be a better proposition than the British government telling the Scottish executive that it wants some of its power back.


News By:

guardian.co.uk

No Male Teachers At 4,500 Primary Schools, Figures Show

Data from the General Teaching Council for England shows that some 27 per cent of primaries – 4,569 – are staffed entirely by women.

Men make up just one-in-eight teachers working in primary schools and only 48 are currently employed in state-run nurseries.

The disclosure comes amid concerns that a lack of positive male role models may be putting boys off school at a young age and fuelling the gender gap in education.

It comes just days after the publication of GCSE results showed that the gulf between girls and boys at the end of secondary school had now widened to a record level.

More than a quarter of exams sat by girls this year was graded at least an A compared with less than a fifth of boys’ test papers, it was revealed.

Academics warned that a shortage of male primary teachers was being exacerbated by irrational concerns over paedophilia.

Prof Alan Smithers, director of the Centre for Education and Employment Research at Buckingham University, said: “The danger of having so many female teachers is that boys get the impression that education is a feminine thing and it is somehow sissy to be fully engaged with education.

"Boys may demonstrate their maleness by standing a bit apart from the learning process.”

He added: “You have to ask yourself why we don’t have more male primary teachers. It may be because women, by virtue of childbearing and bringing up children, are more likely to enjoy being around young children.

“But it may also be down to this deep-rooted suspicion that society seems to have of men who want to work with young children. It is highly unfortunate.”

Figures from the GTC show almost 580,000 teachers are currently registered to work in English schools.

Of those, 25.2 per cent are men compared with 25.4 per cent a year earlier.

In secondary schools, men make up 37.5 per cent of teachers.

But at primary level, they present just 12.4 per cent of the workforce – 26,208 staff in total – while only 3.1 per cent of teachers in state nurseries are male.

The GTC said that 27 per cent of primary schools also had no male teachers at all, although this was down slightly on the 28 per cent of schools with an all-female workforce in 2010.

Despite the imbalance, separate figures from the Department for Education show men are much more likely to be employed as head teachers and deputy heads.

Alan Meyrick, the GTC chief executive, said: “These figures suggest little change in the long-term imbalance between the numbers of men and women both in the profession as a whole and in school leadership roles.

“Women are still underrepresented in senior management roles within schools.

“We need to attract teachers and promote tomorrow’s leaders from the widest possible pool, regardless of gender, so that children can benefit from the greatest talent and experience.”

News By:

telegraph.co.uk

Whitehall Emails Reveal The Hidden Costs Of Promoting Free Schools

The controversial Tory initiative to set up free schools received fast-track public funding after fierce lobbying from education secretary Michael Gove's inner circle of advisers, according to leaked emails.

Civil servants were urged that the New Schools Network (NSN) – a charity providing advice and guidance to set up the schools – should be given "cash without delay", in a disclosure which will heighten concern over the government's lack of transparency about the wider free schools programme.

The charity, which is headed by a former Gove adviser, was subsequently given a £500,000 grant. No other organisation was invited to bid for the work.

The award was made after an email from Dominic Cummings, a Tory strategist and confidant of Gove, called for: "MG telling the civil servants to find a way to give NSN cash without delay."

Cummings went on to work for the charity on a freelance basis.

Sent after the election last May, his message goes on to say: "Labour has handed hundreds of millions to leftie orgs – if u guys cant navigate this thro the bureauc then not a chance of any new schools starting!!"

The existence of the email can be revealed as the first 24 free schools prepare to open their doors to pupils.

The first wave of free schools includes one which has the journalist Toby Young as its chair of governors, two Jewish faith schools, a Hindu school and a Sikh school. At least three of the schools – Discovery new school in West Sussex, St Luke's in north London, and Canary Wharf college – will have a Christian ethos. The Maharishi school in Lancashire, which was founded by the Beatles' guru Maharish Mahesh Yogi and teaches children to meditate, has become a state school as part of the programme.

The schools will be the most prominent part of the Tories' "big society" vision, although in many cases faith organisations, education companies or existing academy sponsors have taken the lead rather than groups of parents or teachers.

The government has declined to reveal the costs of funding individual free schools but estimates the overall budget for buildings at between £110m to £130m.

It has also declined requests under the Freedom of Information Act to identify the groups applying to open free schools next year.

In the email Cummings sets out a timetable for the creation of free schools.

He outlines a list of demands – from a "legislative/regulatory timetable" to a "big early july conference with hundreds coming (paid for by dcsf)".

Legislation to enable the creation of free schools was pushed through parliament last summer under procedures usually reserved for counter-terrorism measures. The government held a free schools conference – which David Cameron addressed by videolink – in January.

The message was addressed to Gove; his senior policy adviser Sam Freedman; Rachel Wolf, who heads the NSN; and Gove's special adviser Henry de Zoete.

Lisa Nandy, a Labour member of the education select committee, said: "This is definitive proof that this was a way of diverting taxpayers' money to pay for a political agenda, at a time when the government was making huge spending cuts. Just shortly after that grant was announced they cancelled Building Schools for the Future – it's pretty shocking.

"This confirms what many suspected, that there is a political agenda behind the decision to hand over the money to the NSN. Gove has serious questions to answer – this message is addressed to him, the money was handed over shortly afterwards in a fog of confusion."

A further leaked email reveals the blurred boundaries which existed between Gove's team and the New Schools Network.

In the email, Wolf is asked by one of Gove's staff to provide the prime minister with a "line to take" after a Tory councillor in Birmingham raised concerns that a free school in his city had the potential to be "socially divisive and undermine … community cohesion".

Wolf worked as a special adviser to Gove while he was shadow education secretary. The NSN website says it is an "independent charity" which has been given a government grant to act as the first point of contact with free school proposers.

Nandy said the email indicated the NSN had been given public money to act as "a propaganda machine for a political agenda".

"What they are asking for is a way to play down the negative impact of free schools. They gave this contract to the New Schools Network to provide independent, impartial advice to people setting up free schools. That should surely include advice on the downside of setting up new schools, not just the positive. They were given taxpayers' money in order to act as a propaganda machine for a political agenda."

The email from Cummings gives an indication of the attitude towards the civil service by those around Gove.

He writes that: "There needs to be an announcement soon about indicative timetables for new schools and what is going to be achieved before august. Forcing the conference in july will force the department to focus on it."

Another leaked email exchange indicates Cummings was closely involved in government work, showing he was invited to a "prep session" ahead of the spending review last October.

According to the emails, this involved "posing challenging questions to SoS [Gove] to ensure that his briefing is adequate and to iron out any detailed narrative."

Wolf said that Cummings started work for the NSN as a volunteer at the end of June, and freelanced for them from July to December last year.

She said: "He initially volunteered then we hired him as a freelancer paid by the half day. He did various projects – mostly publications, communications and strategy. He averaged about 10 days a month.

"We were always extremely clear about what specific jobs he was doing for us. He had a standard freelance contract like the others we hire. Those jobs were not about Michael [Gove] and politics. We hired him because he's really, really good and we know that he believes in what we're doing, and he helped us out a lot.

"I'm confident we didn't do anything that was inappropriate. We're obviously very mindful of our obligations as a charity."

Wolf said the NSN had not received any government funds since mid-July and was being financed entirely by donors.

Cummings said the NSN has "unique abilities", and without it there would not have been any free schools this year.

"It was no secret that I thought NSN should be funded as fast as possible so that new schools could open as fast as possible – I said the same thing to senior officials many times."

A Department for Education spokeswoman said the NSN was an established support group and "was best placed to help get the free schools policy off the ground quickly, and to help meet the demand of parents for good, new local schools".

She added: "It is legitimate for government departments to award grants to charities and other organisations in certain circumstances. This in line with procurement rules and the Department for Education has done this before."

News By:

guardian.co.uk

Test cricket Soon Irrelevant: Holding

West Indian great Michael Holding doesn't like what he sees.

The fearsome fast bowler reckons his nickname Whispering Death fits the future of Test cricket.

"I definitely fear for Test cricket," Holding told AAP.
Advertisement: Story continues below

"Test cricket may be around in five years time but it will become insignificant, it will not be relevant."

Holding is in Australia to promote a compelling film, Fire In Babylon, documenting the West Indies' rise to world cricket domination.

And when he reflects on the state of cricket, it saddens him - saddened by Twenty20 usurping Test cricket, by West Indies cricket, by Brett Lee.

Holding believes the Twenty20 format is causing irreparable damage.

"When you see what is happening all around the world with all this Twenty20 cricket - Australia have now gone to two months of Twenty20 cricket, solitary Twenty20, nothing else," he said.

"The format is not good because you cannot produce good cricketers from Twenty20, but also because it is so highly biased financially.

"Kids all around the place want to play Twenty20 because they can earn in one season of Twenty20 what they earn in four or five years of Test cricket.

"And if I was a young man today, I would want to do that myself. I might get $800,000 to go and play six weeks in India - done.

"I don't blame the cricketers, I blame the administrators."

Holding, an awe-inspiring express paceman who took 249 wickets in 60 Tests, was also concerned for the future of his craft.

"It is pretty ordinary," he said of current fast bowling stocks.

"You don't have too many fast bowlers around the world these days and I think there is so much cricket being played, it's difficult to keep on producing fast bowlers.

"And even when a fast bowler comes along, he's not going to last.

"Look at Brett Lee - Brett Lee is one of the saddest stories as far as I'm concerned.

"Last year I was here for the Ashes, I saw Brett on the street and asked him why he wasn't playing.

"He said 'Mikey, I can't be bothered with this Test cricket, Twenty20 is the go' and that is because of the workload."

Holding also cited Australian Shaun Tait and New Zealand's Shane Bond as evidence.

"The ICC, in coordination with the different boards around the world, they need to recognise that you cannot kill the goose that laid the golden egg," he said.

"You have to have quality instead of quantity.

"People talk about Test cricket dying - because the quality of Test cricket is sinking, because there is too much of it.

"People don't want to see mediocrity, they will turn up for the big series yet the rest of it, they will say 'well, why should I?'."

Holding believed many Australians will turn up for the film Fire In Babylon, tracing the climb of West Indies cricket from the mid-1970s to ruling the world for a 15-year period when they didn't lose a Test series.

The documentary, which starts an Australian season next month, placed race as a central factor in the Windies' rise, purporting a motivation of one-time slaves to beat their colonial masters.

The theme doesn't sit well with Holding.

"It is very powerful, very political," Holding said of the film.

"I can't say I'm 100 per cent with the final product to be honest, because I think the race thing was overplayed a little bit.

"But I can understand when people are making documentaries they perhaps need to make a greater impact so they overplay certain things.

"Some of the interviews they did with some of the Caribbean personalities didn't really reflect how we as cricketers thought, but perhaps we are the sidelines.

"At no time that I played in that team did I ever get the impression from anybody that we were playing against these people because they were former colonisers, I didn't get that impression.

"We were just playing cricket.

"We wanted to beat everyone and whether they were white, black, green, pink, Australian, English, Pakistani - we just wanted to beat them."

Holding described the Windies' ascension from entertainers to world beaters as "a perfect storm".

"World Series Cricket contributed a great deal ... West Indies had always produced a lot of great cricketers but we, on very few occasions, produced great teams.

"Under the Packer banner, because we were all banned from international cricket, we moulded more as a family and as a team.

"We also got a lot fitter because we trained a lot harder and did a lot more physical things.

"And of course there was some talent there as well."

Now, Holding was "very much" saddened by West Indies cricket.

"West Indies need a plan ... we are still sitting around and waiting for things to happen and waiting for it to turn around, instead of putting things in place to make things turn around," he said.

"Every time I think about the West Indies cricket board and the people sitting on the West Indies cricket board, I get even more upset.

"Because I know a lot of them roll up just to say they are directors of the West Indies cricket board and they are not there for the game itself, they are there for themselves."


News By:

theage.com.au

Cricket: Thomas, Carroll Welsh Club Cricket Conference

NOT much cricket was played in the Thomas, Carroll Welsh Club Cricket Conference on Saturday as several matches that had started were hit again by a late afternoon shower which forced them to be abandoned.

One that did finish was at Llanarth against Bridgend side Great Western in Division Two and Llanarth went in first.

Mark Baxter reached 800 runs for the season when he scored a fine 93, while Sam Michell made 48, Ramon Butt 42 and Gareth Powell 31 not out as Llanarth totalled 223-4 in their reduced 40 overs.

The Railwaymen managed 181-8 in their reply with Kris Tobin getting 35, Phil Cadogan 32 and Kevin Williams 25, while Baxter took 2-18 for Llanarth and Chris Powell 2-36.

Bottom side Newport III were at home to third-placed Barry Wanderers, who won the toss and elected to bat.

Gareth Lanagan scored a brilliant 116 and had excellent support from Aled Hughes (71) in a total of 279-6. Scott Thornton took 2-43 off eight overs for Newport III.

Hanish managed 31 when Newport III batted, but Dan Bowles took 4-37 off eight overs for the Wanderers, Neil Blundell had 2.4-2-2-3 and Gareth Jones 10-1-32-3 to get them all out for 91.

Barry Wanderers Seconds also played at home in Division One Second XI where Pontymister were the visitors.

Going in first, the Wanderers reached 248-5 with Krishna Nandan getting 68, Tom Ridgewell 58, Paul Sawyer 32 and Andrew Fenton 20 not out. John Samuels took 2-68 off 10 overs for Pontymister.

Shami Awan dominated the Pontymister innings with a magnificent 127, getting support from Mo Athar (23) and Samuels (20), but their last wicket fell dramatically in the 38th over when the scores were tied.

Nandan took 5-37 for the Wanderers and K P Nekkanti 3-41.

Lisvane IV lost to Bridgend Town IV in Division Two Second XI.


News By:

walesonline.co.uk

England Heroes Cook And Trott In Running To Be ICC Player Of The Year

England batsmen Alastair Cook and Jonathan Trott have been short-listed for the International Cricket Council’s LG player of the year award.

The duo have also been nominated in the Test player list alongside paceman James Anderson, while five England players have been included in the ICC’s Test team of the year.

Tim Bresnan is also in contention for the Twenty20 international performance of the year prize.

Cook and Trott have been key in England’s ascent to the top of the ICC Test rankings and have been nominated alongside Indian great Sachin Tendulkar and South Africa’s Hashim Amla for the top player prize, which will be presented at a gala event in London on September 12.

Cook and Trott, who both played key roles in England’s Ashes success Down Under at the turn of the year, are joined by Anderson on the short list for the Test player of the year alongside Jacques Kallis of South Africa.

Cook, Trott and Anderson are joined by England all-rounder Stuart Broad and spinner Graeme Swann in the Test team of the year, while Bresnan is in contention for the 20-over performance prize and is up against New Zealand’s Tim Southee, Australian Shane Watson and South Africa’s JP Duminy.

England have no nominees on the one-day international player award short list.


News By:

dailymail.co.uk

Getting In Team Easy, Staying There Will Be Tough: Rahane

Mumbai: One of the most prolific scorers in domestic cricket in the last four seasons, Mumbai’s Ajinkya Rahane had been waiting patiently for a national call-up. And when it finally came in England, the 23-year-old grabbed it with both hands, making 158 runs in five ODI after a quick-fire 61 in the one-off T20 to announce his arrival on the international scene. In a chat with The Indian Express, Rahane, who returned home on Sunday, spoke about the experience of playing in England, and on what has changed for him in the last three weeks. Excerpts:

Are you satisfied with your performance in your debut series?

Partly yes, the series went really well but I feel it could have gone even better. The series surely gave me some confidence but am not satisfied with my performance. I got starts but couldn’t convert them and it would have been great had we won a few matches.

You used to open for Mumbai before dropping down the order. How did you feel when you were asked to open in England?

I was a bit nervous and it’s natural, especially when you are asked to open at such a big stage. Playing for the country is, after all, a different experience. I just kept things simple and played my natural game against a very good bowling attack.

But was it difficult for you to adjust, given that you were also new to the conditions?

I played a practice game before the T20 match, so I told myself that this is the only time to revise before going into the big test. I was ready mentally to take up the challenge, it was just a matter of controlling myself.

There must have been pressure on you to make the chance count. How did you cope with it?


Pressure is bound to happen; after all, you are playing for the country, and being watched by millions of people. It was an opportunity for me to learn but I need to learn the art of building an innings now.

Now that you have made it to the Indian team, what do you think you need to do in order to cement your place?

I have just entered international cricket. One thing is clear that it will not be an easy task. Surviving for a long period will demand more hard work. One has to be even more focussed than before. Getting in is easy but staying at the top will be tough.

Did those 4600-plus runs in domestic cricket help in England?

They did. But mentally you still aren’t sure till you finally put bat on ball in international cricket. When I travelled to England, there were plenty of things going on in my mind. I didn’t know whether I would get a chance or not. After I played my first shot in the Twenty20 game — towards point — the confidence came. I told myself that I belong here. Hope the things go all right in the future too.

Did you regret not converting your starts into one big, defining knock in the ODI series?

I regret it but as a batsman I tried to play my shots as per the merit of the ball. I need to learn the art of building innings. I talked to some seniors about it, and I need to put in more hard work.

You had a few good partnership with Parthiv Patel. How was the understanding between you two?

We told ourselves that we will just try to stay at the crease for a while and then play our strokes. If any loose balls come in, then we will try to cash in because the conditions were challenging, and we were up against a quality bowling attack. Parthiv and I played the short ball well because we were ready for it.

After the England tour, what has changed for you as an individual?

I’m still myself but people have started to recognise me, which feels good. When I went to England nobody knew who I was but when I came back, people knew my name. From England airport to Mumbai, people complimented my effort. But it’s just a start.

News By:

cricket.expressindia.com

Pressure On Attorney General To Block Met Move Against Press Freedom

The attorney general, Dominic Grieve, is facing growing pressure to block an attempt by the Metropolitan police to use the Official Secrets Act to force journalists to reveal their sources.

As senior Liberal Democrats indicated that Nick Clegg was "sympathetic" to journalists, police sources also expressed unease after Scotland Yard applied last week for an order under the 1989 act to require the Guardian to identify its sources on phone hacking. One police source said the decision to invoke the act was "likely to end in tears" for the Met.

Lib Dem sources said that as deputy prime minister, Clegg was unable to express a view on what action the attorney general should take. But senior Lib Dems lined up at the party conference in Birmingham to call on the attorney general to use his powers to rule that the Yard's use of the act is not in the public interest.

Simon Hughes, the Lib Dem deputy leader, who is suing News International over alleged phone hacking at the News of the World, said: "Millions of people believe the Guardian has done a public service by exposing the series of scandals behind phone hacking carried out on a regular basis by individuals on behalf of other media organisations like the Murdoch empire. It is entirely inappropriate for the Officials Secret Act to be used to try to prosecute journalists who have taken these actions.

"I hope that the law officers, or the government more widely, will make it clear that such an intervention and such a prosecution would not be in the public interest. The police or the Crown Prosecution Service may be able to justify on technical grounds that this is the proper thing to do. But the wider interests should prevail and the sooner a decision is made to end plans to prosecute the better."

Don Foster, a veteran Lib Dem MP who advises the culture secretary, Jeremy Hunt, informally on media issues, called on the attorney general to block the "extremely bizarre" use of the act. "I understand the attorney general has the opportunity to use this power," Foster said after a fringe meeting, organised by the Hacked Off campaign, that was addressed by the actor Hugh Grant. "He should use it and say this is not in the public interest."

Foster, who praised the Guardian for "fantastic journalism" in exposing phone hacking, found unanimous support at the fringe meeting when he asked whether the Guardian's disclosure that Milly Dowler's phone had been hacked – the revelation that prompted the police use of the Official Secrets Act – was justified. The MP said: "If it was in the public interest for the Guardian to do what they did, it is extremely bizarre, it is almost unheard of, for the Metropolitan police to have used the Official Secrets Act as the basis for seeking to get hold of the information they want.

"It is absolutely vital that we find out first of all who actually signed off agreement to use the Official Secrets Act and, secondly, we have to have a very, very clear explanation of why they are doing it. A final decision is made by the attorney general as to whether to allow it to happen. The one good bit of news is that, in making his decision, the attorney general can use public interest as one of the criteria that he considers. I hope he will very seriously indeed."

The Met's actions were also condemned by other newspapers: in a leader in the Times, the Met is accused of using the Official Secrets Act "not to protect the public interest but as a punitive measure to curb journalistic inquiry and pursue a sectarian and self-interested campaign". It goes on to say that the "principle and the method in the Met's action are wrong. They are not only a constraint on the Guardian's reporting, but an attack on the principles of free expression, the workings of a free press and the future of investigative journalism".

The Daily Telegraph described the situation as a "direct attack on the freedom of the press" and "an intolerable abuse of power". Its leader asks if the Met are "seriously contemplating that the first prosecutions arising from the phone-hacking scandal should involve the very people who exposed it?"

Tom Brake, chair of the Lib Dem home affairs committee, said: "The use of the Official Secrets Act in these circumstances is very unusual, and all the more worrying because it does not allow the defendant to argue that their actions were in the public interest. The Met need to explain why they think it is appropriate to use the Official Secrets Act in this case. While this is clearly a matter for the police and the attorney general, I do question whether this action is in the public interest given everything that has happened, or indeed in the interests of investigative journalism."

The political unease was echoed in police circles. One insider asked: "When was the last time the OSA [Official Secrets Act] was used successfully against the media?"

The source added that the Met had to be seen to be rigorous, but threatening to get a production order requiring the handing over of notes and the revealing of sources was a step too far: "No one was expecting us to use the OSA. Usually the use of the OSA ends in tears." With the new Met commissioner, Bernard Hogan-Howe, not due to start his job as Britain's top police officer officially until later this month, the source added: "He is not even in office and he is facing his first crisis."

Grant said at the Hacked Off meeting: "A lot of us victims and campaigners had come to the view that the new police inquiry – [Operation] Weeting under Sue Akers – was good cops. It was a new investigation. They were embarrassed by the behaviour of their predecessors and colleagues. So for them to suddenly turn on their fellow goodies in this battle is worrying and deeply mysterious."

The Met said that the application for a production order was made under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act and did not seek to use powers under the OSA. But the police said that the OSA was mentioned in the application because a possible offence under that act might have been committed.

News By:

guardian.co.uk

Schools Prevented From Becoming Academies By Bank Fears Over PFI Deals

The government's flagship programme to convert hundreds of schools to academies has been delayed after banks refused to sign private finance contracts.

At least 16 schools that were due to leave local authority control at the start of this term have been put on hold after banks questioned whether councils would still be liable for PFI repayments.

Councils have been forced to step in to run the schools while the problems are resolved. Teachers have been transferred back to local authority payrolls and the disbanded governing bodies reformed.

The delay could hit dozens more schools that were rebuilt under PFI schemes, and the government is calling in lawyers to reassure the banks. Ministers could be forced to rewrite legislation, which was fast-tracked in the weeks after the coalition was formed, to clarify the situation.

Labour blamed the problems on the pace at which Michael Gove, the education secretary, has pursued the reforms.

Nearly 1,000 schools have converted to academy status since the election including 185 this month. Under Gove's legislation, a local authority ceases to maintain a school when it converts to academy status. Banks fear this means councils no longer have the authority to make repayments.

At least nine authorities, including Nottinghamshire, Sheffield, Devon and Kent have been affected. In Northamptonshire, which had the biggest PFI school-building programme in Britain, two schools are affected – but a total of 41 were either built or remodelled under PFI.

An email sent by John True, Nottinghamshire county council's schools service director, suggests that the legislation may have to be amended.

The email, written on Thursday and which the Guardian has seen, says: "The schools were due to formally change their status on 1 September, however due to a last minute technical issue in respect of the PFI contract this has not been possible.

"The DfE [Department for Education] are working on the issue on a national basis, as it has implications for all PFI academy conversions and may ultimately require a change in the education bill due to be enacted in January 2012."

John Mann, the Labour MP for Bassetlaw in Nottinghamshire, who has two affected schools in his constituency, said: "It's an extraordinary incompetence and error by Michael Gove.

"There are issues about academy schools, about whether they are a good idea. There are also issues about PFI. But for him on his flagship policy to get the law wrong brings into question whether he should be in the job."

At the two schools, Portland and Valley, teachers are still employed by the council but are being managed by the Outwood Grange Academy Trust. Northamptonshire county council said Weston Favell secondary and Duston schools were "officially operating in the guise of academies because the relationships have all been set up – but technically they're not".

News By:

guardian.co.uk